Monday, August 31, 2009

Movies of Next Month: September 2009

The Summer is now officially over and we can all go back to school (unless of course you’re already finished school), as a result of less time for kids to spend at the movie theater the less likely to succeed films come out in September. Are all the films that come out in September look like crap? Let’s find out.

Extract poster Extract (9-4-09)

Story: A manager of a nut factory is having a hard time in his life. An accident at the factory results in a lawsuit, his wife is cheating on him, and he just isn’t happy. This movie a comedy about his life.

Worth Seeing?: The biggest draw to this movie is that  it’s directed by Mike Judge. Mike Judge is the creator of shows like King of the Hill and Bevis and Butthead. He also created cult classics such as Office Space and Idiocracy. It’s really up to you whether this film would be worth your time or not.

all_about_steve_poster All About Steve (9-4-09)

Story: Mary is a woman that has trouble with men, but when she meets a man named Steve she falls in love. She then stalks him.

Worth Seeing?: Most men and myself would probably not like a rom com about a woman stalking a man.  I can’t really speak for women though because I’m not a woman.

gamer-poster Gamer (9-4-09)

Story: In the future there’s a video game with the most realistic graphics around. Why? because the game is actually real life and people are being controlled by these gamers. One of these people are played by Gerald Butler (the “This is Sparta” guy) being controlled by a teenager.

Worth Seeing?: This movie looks a little bit like a stupid action film. The storyline is a bit creative, but the chances are this is another mindless action flick. If you like mindless action films then this might be the movie for you.

9-poster 9 (9-9-09)

Story: In the future, machines have taken over the world, and humanity is now extinct, and the only living organism (or close to living organism) are 9 sack boys. This is the story of their survival.

Worth Seeing?: Like District 9, this movie is based on a short film. The short film itself is actually really good. Another draw to this movie is that it’s produced by Tim Burton. Sure that only means he pays for the movie, but that also says that this experienced director thought that this was a good movie idea.

Coincidence?: Here’s a bit of a coincidence. This movie called “9” is based on a short film, but one month prior there was a film called “District 9” which was also based on a short. Both films are also directed by the short’s director, but are produced by a big name director. A bit of a coincidence isn’t it?

whiteout_poster Whiteout (9-11-09)

Story: Kate Beckinsale is a scientist in an Antarctic base. Its already dangerous enough with the weather, but then people start getting murdered. Spoilers: The murderer isn’t a person at all, its Penguins. They’re mad that there hasn’t been a penguin movie since 2007. Why did Happy Feet become Homicidal?

Worth Seeing?: I am a mystery fan, but I don’t really know how suspenseful a thriller can be when it's named after an office supply.

i-can-do-bad-all-by-myself-poster   Tyler Perry’s I can do Bad All by Myself (9-11-09)

Story: Tyler Perry’s Reoccurring character Madea finds these two kids breaking into her home. She then takes the kids to their closest relative who is their deadbeat aunt who doesn’t want to take care of them.

Worth Seeing?: If you’re a fan of Tyler Perry then this movie might be for you. Otherwise, this film looks like nothing special. We all know how this movie will end and it doesn’t look like the journey to that point looks bland.

cloudy_with_a_chance_of_meatballs_poster   Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (9-18-09)

Story: An ambitious but idiotic inventor in a town that only eats anchovies is trying to invent something revolutionary. He soon. comes up with a invention that turns water into food. When that device gets accidentally launched into the atmosphere, the clouds starts raining food.  But raining food doesn’t come without consequences. 

Worth Seeing?: Based on a classic children's book by the same name. It could be a very funny film, but at the same time it looks like it could easily fail. Only reviews from paid critics and personal pretences could help with whether or not this is a must see film.

jennifers_body_poster Jennifer’s Body (9-18-09)

Story: Jennifer (Megan Fox) is an everyday popular high school girl. Except for the fact that she eats people.

Worth Seeing?: This movie is the be embarrassed about seeing movie of the year. If you go to see this and tell girls that you seen it then you probably wouldn’t get dates from those girls. What I’m saying is that the only draw to Jennifer’s Body is Megan Fox’s body. Diablo Cody thinks that the fact that she wrote it is another draw to this film, but no. Juno in my opinion was a slightly overrated. With that said; the credentials  of writing Juno doesn’t guarantee that Jennifer’s Body would be well written. Why? Because Jennifer’s Body is a lot different then Juno. Writing a heart warming tale doesn’t imply that you could write a good horror comedy. The chances are; Juno was just a fluke, and people are only going to Jennifer’s Body for eye candy.

informant-poster The Informant (9-18-09)

Story: Matt Damon is playing a rising star in a big company. But when the FBI asks him to be their informant, then he goes undercover to gather evidence against his company. Unfortunately for the FBI; he isn’t the best informant.

Worth Seeing?: When I first heard of a movie about Matt Damon being an informant and going undercover; I thought that it was a drama/Thriller. Then I saw the trailer and saw that this was a comedy, a hilarious looking comedy.

fame-poster Fame (9-25-09)

Story: Fame follows the story of students of the New York City High School of Performing Arts. That’s pretty much it.

Worth Seeing?: This movie looks like a life film. What’s a life film? Its films about that are not really about anything except life. With that said; Fame could easily be boring for a person that isn’t in to this type of movie. What I mean is that non-musical fans might not like this movie.

invention_of_lying_poster Invention of Lying (9-25-09)

Story: In an alternative reality where everybody tells the truth and nothing but the truth, one man has just invented the lie. He then uses his invention to his advantage.

Worth Seeing?: The movie’s storyline is very creative and makes for a good comedy. It stars and is directed by British comedian Ricky Gevais, and judging by last year’s Ghost Town he is a very funny comedian. This will probably be good.

surrogates-poster Surrogates (9-25-09)

Story: In the future; people have became even lazier and decided to instead of living life themselves they take control of robots called Surrogates to live life for them. The effect of this is that crime is now a thing of the past. Its perfect until the first murder in 15 year occurs and FBI agent Greer (yes Greer) discovers a huge conspiracy.

Worth Seeing?: This film looks okay. It doesn’t look too good, doesn’t look too bad. It could go either way.

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Bad Book Report: Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein

 Mary Shelly Hello Mellow Filmmaker here.

Throughout history there were books that innovated story telling for ages to come, Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein was one of them. Frankenstein is a story most people know about a scientist making a monster that just wants to be loved. The book is hailed as an innovation in the horror genre; never before had monsters been represented in a sympathetic manor. While it is innovated it does have problems which is why it is a subject for a Bad Book Report.

Volume 1:

The edition of Frankenstein I’ve read has the first fourth of the book comprised of the history of the novel. I didn’t bother reading all of it, but the little I did read told me that the book was actually critically panned when it first came out. Anyway on to the story; the book starts with few letters from a sailor R. Walton to his sister Mrs Saville. Most of what we learn from these letters is back story that would no doubt be pointless, and the fact that Walton can’t find a friend as intellectual as he is. In the fourth letter something finally happens that moves along the plot. The ship that Walton is a sailor on, is sailing through the arctic when they found a man on a sledge drawn by dogs. They take the man in there ship because he’s freezing and starving. We learn that while the man lives on the ship Walton figures out that this man was the friend he was looking for. At the end of the letter the stranger sits down with Walton to tell his back story and why he’s here.

Okay for those of you who are wondering; yes this stranger is Dr. Victor Von Frankenstein, but the problem is that the book doesn’t tell us this until a few chapters in. Which when I would think of a character telling his life story I would think it would start with him telling us his name. The funny thing is that his name is not even said in a reveal of any kind it was just said in a regular conversation.

Anyway since it’s no longer letters but a character telling a story now the chapters are called chapters instead of letters. Frankenstein starts off by telling us how his parents met. Yes, Frankenstein is really starting from the beginning. Okay so the next four chapters tell us his whole life story up until this point. We learn  about his siblings including his adoptive sister Elizabeth (who for some reason is called his cousin Elizabeth), his childhood friends, the death of his mother, and the fact that he found a fascination for science. The character back story goes on for four and a half chapters. After that Frankenstein then decides he wants to reanimate life into dead tissue, and then he creates a monster. That last sentence pretty much summed up the creation of Frankenstein’s monster.The book goes into minimal buildup or detail into the monster’s creation. Which is ironic because the book spent so much time telling the back stories of Frankenstein and Walton, yet the creation of the monster it self seems rushed. When I read it I thought maybe I skipped a couple of pages, but no I didn’t.

After Frankenstein created the monster he runs out of his apartment (yes he created it in his apartment) where he runs into his childhood friend Henry. Henry tells Victor that his family is worried about him because he doesn’t write. Victor then takes Henry to his apartment. Victor fears that his monster is still in his apartment, but it turns out that the monster left. Victor then has a breakdown so his friend Henry takes care of his illness. While Victor is being taken care of, he starts sending letters to his family. He learns that his sister, duh… I mean cousin Elizabeth is doing fine but his father is getting older and weaker. A couple of years later he gets a letter telling him that his younger brother William has been murdered.

Frankenstein immediately went to his hometown and it ends up that a family friend named Justine ( Justine is a girl so I think her name is pronounced Jus-Teen and not Jus-Tin) has been arrested for William’s murdered. Why they arrest her is that they find a picture of William’s mother in Justine’s dress, but Victor knows right away that Justine is innocent and the real killer is the monster of his creation. I know that it’s only natural to blame yourself for a family member’s death but I do have to say that the chances of the monster killed William are very low. First of all how would the monster know where you live to get revenge on you? I mean you probably had records of where you lived in your apartment but how would a monster know to read papers and get revenge on your family. Plus the monster probably would be illiterate for being just born so he can’t read on where you live. Even if he does know where you live; how would he know that William was your brother. Even if you kept a painting of him, William's appearance would be different since Victor hasn’t seen him in 6 years.

Justine is then held on trial which to be honest, it wouldn’t be hard to prove that Justine was innocent. First; she had no motive to kill one of her friends. Second; William was strangled to death, seeing that Justine and William were around the same age it would be hard for Justine to overtake William unless Justine was extremely strong and William was a complete pansy (It was the 1800’s, but still). Third; it ended up that Frankenstein’s Monster did kill William, so I would think that there would be big hand marks on William’s neck, any competent investigator would just see that Justine’s hands are a lot smaller then the markings on William’s neck (assuming that the 7 foot tall monster’s hands are larger then the girl in her mid teen’s hands). But courts in those days completely sucked because Justine is convicted and executed.

Victor, knowing that Justine is innocent, goes off to find the real killer (meaning his monster). It doesn’t take long for Victor to find his monster. When Victor confronts his monster, his monster says that he doesn’t want to fight and has a story to tell. The book then goes into its second volume.

Volume 2:

The volume starts with Frankenstein’s Monster escaping Victor’s apartment and getting some clothing. He walks around and learns that he isn’t liked very much, so he heads to the woods.

He finds a cottage owned by a French family. He makes a hovel for himself and spends the next few months listening to them speaking, by doing this he learns how to speak for himself. Wait! How does the family not notice that there’s a 7 foot tall monster listening in on them. Also, the fact that the monster learns to speak just by listening to the family speak is very absurd. Learning the words and attaching the words to meaning are two completely different things. Plus, the monster (who is narrating this volume) seems to have surprisingly good diction for learning how to speak by listening to people. We also learn that the monster learned how to read by just listening to the family. Yes, because all French families have everyday conversations about the alphabet, and how to connect the letter to words, and connect the words to the meaning. Oh my God! There’s just so many plot holes!

After that onslaught of plot holes we get an entire chapter dedicated to the back story of the French Family. This chapter becomes entirely pointless, because in the next chapter the monster attempts to become a member of the family, and of course terrifies them.

Frankenstein’s Monster then ran off until he finds a little girl drowning in the river. The monster jumps in and save her, but her father immediately grabs her in his arms and runs off. The monster runs after them trying to prove that he is good, but the father shoots the monster.Wait, how can the father shoot the monster with a rifle if he’s carrying the little girl. The book never says that he dropped the little girl and its hard to believe that he would drop his daughter. The father then immediately runs off (Did he take his little girl with him? I don’t know).

The monster is wounded, but soon heals. The monster decides to head off to his creator’s hometown. The book says that the monster know where his creator’s hometown is, because he read where Victor lived in Victor’s apartment, which is impossible because the monster didn’t learn how to read until after he left Victor’s apartment ( Plot Hole #27). 

When Frankenstein’s monster arrives in the town he finds a boy. The monster thinks that this child has lived on this earth not long enough to be prejudiced, so he grabs the child. Then the child says “Hideous Monster! Let me go. My papa is a syndic- he is M. Frankenstein- he will punish you. You dare not keep me.”

Wait so the child is William? But William was in his teens, yet the book describes a little boy  by saying that the child has all the sportiveness of infancy and lived too short a time to be prejudiced. Nobody would think that a teen would be two young to be prejudiced. Also nobody would say someone’s name with replacing their first name with an initial. People do that while writing but not speaking. The funny thing is that William’s father’s name starts with an A and not an M. Is M a title?

After William declares that he is a Frankenstein, the monster strangles him to death. He then takes a picture of William’s mother which was on William, and hides out in a barn where he find Justine sleeping. He then slips a picture of William’s mother into Justine's dress. The monster then runs off and his narration ends.

Frankenstein just sits there staring at his monster, furious at the fact that the monster did commit the murders. The monster requests that he should build him a bride, if he doe this then the monster and his bride would stop harming humans and leave to South America. How does monster even know about South America? Did the French Family have a conversation about it? Getting to South America should also be a real pain seeing that you can’t get their without going on a boat which would have prejudiced humans on it. The Monster tells Frankenstein that if he doesn’t do this then he would harm his loved ones. Then Frankenstein leaves to do the monster’s bidding. Here we leave Volume 2 and enter the third and final volume.

Volume 3:

Frankenstein returns to his hometown to get his father’s consent to go to England. It then ends up that Frankenstein is going to marry Elizabeth after Frankenstein finish his task, wait what! He’s marrying Elizabeth? When did they ever foreshadow him marrying Elizabeth? Sure they it was said that Victor loved her during his back story, but when did he propose? Maybe he did after William's murder, but that would be the worst timing for a proposal. Not to mention that he hasn’t seen Elizabeth for 6 years so just seeing her now and proposing to her is a bit strange. Last but definitely not least, Elizabeth is practically Frankenstein’s sister! I know that their not blood related, but marrying someone who was raised by the same parents as you is pretty sick.

Frankenstein then goes to England and Sweden to get equipment and learn more so he can create a bride for his monster, while going into every single little detail on how beautiful the country is. After the travel guide, Frankenstein obtains a laboratory and starts assembling the bride. He then ponders what he’s doing; thinking that he doesn’t want to release another monster in the world, and maybe the bride would be worse then the first monster. He then has a spazz attack and rips up the body. It ends up that the monster had been following him, and isn’t happy that he went back on his promise. The monster the says “I will be with you on your wedding night,” the monster then runs off.

Frankenstein is frightened at this remark, but he decides to sail back home (he was on a island near Sweden at the time). Frankenstein soon lands on a dock where he greeted by some rude Scottish men who say that he’s committed a crime. He is then arrested and tried for the murder. The trial goes on with witnesses going reciting the account of finding the dead body and somebody sailing away. The funny thing is that during the trial they actually mention the finger marks on the victim’s neck. I would think that if they would just compare the markings on the neck to Frankenstein’s hands then they would see that he didn’t murder the person, but trails back then didn’t really know anything about decisive evidence. The trial decides that they should show the body to Frankenstein to see how he reacts. Yes, because cold hearted killers react when they see the bodies of their victims. They show him body and he sees that it is Henry who is the victim. Frankenstein then reacts in Germen to the body (which is his native language),  and speaking Germen is enough to convince the Scottish that he’s the killer and they arrest him.

A few months go by in prison and then Victor gets a visit from his father who bails him out of prison. Victor’s father then gives Victor a letter from Elizabeth. The letter starts with her saying that they are practically brother and sister ( oh good she finally came to her senses), but it ends with Elizabeth asking if Victor loves another and that’s the reason he’s depressed. One thing I found weird was the Elizabeth says the she’s been getting news about him from her uncle. Does she mean some Uncle of Victor’s or does he mean Victor’s father who is technically her father but could called her uncle because she is referred to as Victor’s Cousin (It’s so confusing). 

Victor then sails back to his hometown with his father and tells Elizabeth that he still loves her and they get married (the joining of the two families: Frankenstein and Frankenstein).

Victor and Elizabeth then sails to an island as a happily married couple/siblings. Victor remembers his monster’s promise so he keeps on his guard carrying a knife and a pistol (wait if you think about why didn’t Victor take a weapon to confront the monster earlier?). While Victor is patrolling the hallways he hears a scream from Elizabeth. He runs and finds out that she was strangled and the monster is running off(Evil Being! How dare he stop Victor from fornicating with his sister!).

Victor then returns to his father to tell him of the bad news. His father is saddened at the news and dies ten days later of an illness. Victor then goes to captain of the police force and tells him the entire story of the monster. The captain replies by saying “I don’t believe your story, there’s just too many plot holes.” Okay fine he didn’t actually say that, he actually believed Victor’s story but doesn’t want to risk his men on attacking a dangerous monster. Victor now on a quest of vengeance, the goes off in search of the monster, up until the part where he was founded by Walton.

The last few chapters are letters from Walton to his sister. The funny thing is that speaks his sister in a very romantic way. Does he feel about his sister the same way Victor felt about Elizabeth? I’ve got a feeling that its worse because their probably blood related! Was making love to your sister not frowned upon back then?

The only groundbreaking thing that happens is that Victor actually dies. After the death we find the monster looming over Victor’s coffin. The monster gives a big speech which I think is suppose to make us feel bad about him. The only thing I feel is relief that this novel is over and I can go and read something better.

To be fair this book isn’t horrible like the last book I’ve done a bad book report on (Breaking Dawn). Its innovative, well written, and not too boring. But behind the innovation I just see a story filled with plot holes and discontinuity.

By the way if you read all of this article, then I say thank you.

 

 

Saturday, August 1, 2009

Movies of the Month: July 2009

The summer so far has produced many bad films. It started with the awful X-Men Origins: Wolverine, continued with Terminator Salvation, and the month of June started us off with Land of the Lost. With May and June being such a disaster, will July follow in it’s footsteps? Let’s find out while I review all the films I saw in theaters in the Month of July.

Ice Age 3 Poster Ice Age Dawn of the Dinosaurs: This was surprising good. Much better then Ice Age 2 and almost as good as the first Ice Age. While the possums are still annoying, Queen Latifah’s character  Elle has became likable, and the new character Buck (voiced by Sean William Scott) is very likable. Plus the action is good but doesn’t take away from the plot. In my opinion this is a very underrated film.

4 out of 5 Stars

The Brothers Bloom poster The Brothers Bloom: It took awhile for me to see this film, but I finally was able to go see it at a dollar theater. This film was just okay. While at times the film was funny, it didn’t make up for a plot that at times didn’t make sense. Also it was very over the top and the ending didn’t make any sense.

3 out of 5 Stars

public-enemies-poster Public Enemies: This was good but not great. While it had a good story it just felt very slow. I like the alternative way they filmed it making it seem more realistic at times, but at other times it seemed everything was shoved in your face. It was a likable film none the less.

4 out of 5 Stars

harrypotter6poster Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince: The last Harry Potter film was very disappointing, but the new one makes up for it. Unlike the last time it seemed that this one had time for subplots and not everything was about Harry. The way the film was shot in a very stylish manor which gives direction points to David Yates. The only problem I have with this film was that they toned down the ending so it becomes a little anti-climatic. I heard David Yates took the wizard battles out of the ending because having a wizard battle two films in a row would be repetitive [yes because both films having climaxes is very repetitive (Subtract direction points)].

4 1/2 out of 5 Stars

FDSOS_ONESHT.indd 500 Days of Summer: Most films begin at the beginning and end at the end. Others might begin at the end but goes then goes to the beginning through flashback. 500 Days of the Summer defies the convention of chronological story telling, by telling snippets of events that happen in our leading couple’s relationship. It’s shown out of order, but the order it shown through somehow still makes since. Because they decided to do the film in this unique fashion; the film stands out from other independent films. Plus this film is really funny and entertaining. At first glance it seems like a romance film, but trust me when I say that this film is entertaining for both genders (either that or I’m just not that manly).

4 1/2 out 5 Stars

I have to say that this month was better then last month or the month before. More of the films were good and none of them were really crappy. Then again I avoided most of the mainstream films like G-Force & Aliens in the Attic.

Possible Best List Nominees: Harry Potter 6, 500 Days of Summer, maybe Ice Age 3, and maybe Public Enemies.

Possible Worst List Nominees: Didn’t see anything this month that would have a chance of making the 13 worst films of 2009 list.